Jasmon Jackson
The tsunami killed
100 times more people than 9/11, The planet is brutally powerful. Respect it.
Preserve it.

After finding this
PSA ad on Tsunami stats, I wanted to target Japan for its 2011 Tsunami, and the
meaning of its international context used in this specific PSA. This PSA caught
my attention right off. Then the caption adds a whole different aspect to this
meaning.
9/11 was one of the
most devastating times in America’s history. Many lives were lost others were
destroyed. On September 11, 2001 two planes hit the Twin Towers, another hit
the Pentagon and crashed in a field on the way to another destination. Those
four planes altered the lives of thousand. American’s felt violated, was in
fear, and astonished of the affect.
This image is of
New York in America, where the 9/11 attacks happen, and only two planes hit and
traumatized the country. In this image there are several planes flying towards
the building at the same time. The impact would be 100 times more devastating than
what we experienced. Thus, explaining the caption, “The tsunami killed 100
times more people than 9/11, the planet is brutally powerful. Respect it.
Preserve it.”
Although, I had
seen the aftermath of the Tsunami that hit Japan in 2011, and learned of the
fatalities. I had never truly stopped and thought of the affect this natural
disaster had on Japan. This image helps put the affect that the Tsunami truly
had on Japan into perspective. This photographic PSA is dramatic, but it does
make a valid point, therefore I believe that it has met its expectation of the
organizer. However, this image supports a harsh truth that many may not be able
to handle. This PSA would be more accepted internationally, in places such as
Japan than in America. This photo may be held as evidence that different media
messages may be more or less receptive internationally.
One reason I feel this ad may be
more accepted in other countries other than America is because at first site
this image is just an attack on America, which Americans won’t like. Another is
reason may be because Americans may feel as if this PSA is mocking America’s tragedy
or belittling the 9/11 incident. Whereas, in other countries internationally
would see this PSA as a positive message. Japan would feel proud of this
message and their country, for surviving what they been through. Countries who
have been devastated by Tsunamis may see this PSA as hope where America may see
this ad as more terror.
Different people, cultures, and
religions have different beliefs and may each perceive things differently. An
image that may be seen one way in one culture, may represent and be seen
differently in other countries. That is why there are different theories and
context for international communication. Paul Lazarsfeld, analyzed a study with Harold
Lasslow associated with the formula, “who says what in which channel to who
with what effect.” (William B. Gudykunst, 2001) To learn
these channels and how to communicate on an international level we use
communication context.
The cross-situational consistency
debate in psychology has been important for the field of communication because
it has caused scholars to realize that there are trait and situationist
approaches to communication. (Theory, 2009) This theory
fit this situation because it was Talking about 9/11 or the 2011 Tsunami in
Japan to either culture who dealt with that situation and each culture would be
vulnerable, emotional and would explain how traumatically how this affected
their lives and their culture. Therefore, it is imperative that we are careful
what we say and how we approach people of sensitive subjects.
In intercultural or international
communication this is where face negotiation theory comes into play at. Face
negotiation theory explains intercultural conflict and how people from
different cultures work through the various cultural and communicative
obstacles to get resolution based on mutual respect and communication
competence. (Theory, 2009) This theory
is an important in intercultural communication, as well as explains how
different messages can be interpreted differently in by other cultures and
countries.
This PSA is very powerful, and has
a powerful message too it. However, we have learned through international
communication context theories and studies as PSA’s such as these can be
perceived in and interpreted differently by different people. That is why we
must incorporate these theories, be open to learn of others values and ethics
and be able adapt to them to be able to communicate effectively, relay messages,
or influence/persuade someone.
References
Cartwright, M. S. (2009). Practices of Looking:
An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Potter, W. J. (2012). Media Effects. Thousand
Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Theory, C. C. (2009). Dominic A Infante, Anderw
S. Rancer, Theodore A.Avtgis. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Punlishing Company.
William B. Gudykunst, B. M. (2001). Handbook of
international and intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment